“A dark blue QR code on a white background that links to the ActBlue donation page. At its center is the ActBlue logo—a bright blue speech-bubble shape containing a stylized white ‘AB’.”
“Please join the fight to make Missouri for Missourians again.”

Why I’m the Homegrown Choice for Missouri’s 4th District – and Why Mark Alford Isn’t

Summary

When I’m elected as your congressman, I’ll deliver homegrown, common-sense leadership that puts rural Missouri first—not out-of-state special interests like my opponent.

Caricature of Ricky in a navy suit and red tie, smiling with arms crossed in front of a green Missouri road sign. A cheering crowd stands behind him, while a generic man in a suit walks away carrying suitcases toward a “Leaving” sign. Large text reads: “Out-of-State Priorities Don’t Belong Here.”

By Ricky Dana, Candidate for U.S. House of Representatives – Missouri’s 4th District


We both want a stronger Missouri—but the path we take matters. My path is built on homegrown values, rural priorities, and common-sense solutions that come from living and working right here in our community. My opponent’s record, on the other hand, reflects an allegiance to out-of-state donors and Washington insiders.


Homegrown Leadership, Not Outsider Influence

I was born and raised in rural Missouri. I know the struggles our families face because I’ve lived them. My campaign isn’t funded by billionaire donors or PACs from thousands of miles away—it’s powered by Missourians who want real change.

Mark Alford’s campaign, however, leans heavily on out-of-state special interests. That kind of money doesn’t come without strings—and it rarely aligns with the priorities of rural Missouri.


Putting Rural Missouri First

My platform focuses on the things that matter most to our communities:

  • Affordable housing through the Build Missouri First initiative—using federal surplus land and local builders without adding to the national debt.
  • Rural healthcare access so every family can get the care they need close to home.
  • Infrastructure improvements that keep our small towns connected and thriving.

These aren’t just talking points—they’re actionable plans ready for day one.


Contrast in Records

While I focus on targeted investments in our communities, my opponent’s voting record tells a different story. For example, on July 18, 2025, Mark Alford voted for the Rescissions Act, which cut $7.9 billion in foreign aid and $1.1 billion from public broadcasting. That includes PBS and NPR—resources that bring news, education, and culture to rural areas where other options are scarce.

That vote may have pleased party leaders and big donors, but it doesn’t serve rural Missouri families.


Why This Matters

When your representative answers first to outside money, your voice gets lost. I answer to you—the people of Missouri’s 4th District. My commitment is to build a future where our kids have opportunities here at home, not just in the big cities or out-of-state.


Be Part of the Change

This campaign is about more than winning an election—it’s about returning power to the people of Missouri. Every dollar donated helps spread our message, reach more voters, and fight back against the influence of big money in politics.

Donate now to help build Missouri’s future »


Sources:

Build Missouri First Affordable Housing


Mark Alford – Wikipedia


Rural Missouri – Ricky Dana Campaign

Comments

One response to “Why I’m the Homegrown Choice for Missouri’s 4th District – and Why Mark Alford Isn’t”

Leave a Reply to Why I’m the Homegrown Choice for Missouri’s 4th District — and Why Mark Alford Isn’t – Mark "Awful" Alford’s Votes Against MO Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.