by Ricky Dana, Candidate for U.S. House – Missouri’s 4th District
Putting Missouri’s Military Communities First
Here in Missouri’s 4th Congressional District, our military bases and surrounding communities are more than just strategic assets—they are family, neighbors, and part of our economy. Whiteman Air Force Base, Fort Leonard Wood, and the National Guard units across Missouri need leaders who fight for their missions and for the men and women who serve. That’s not a side issue for me—it’s a top priority.
My Opponent’s Record: Committees, but No Action
Mark “Awful” Alford sits on the Appropriations and Small Business Committees. Those positions give him a seat at the table to advocate for our military installations and for Missouri veterans. But look at his record: no major proposals to strengthen Whiteman’s B-2 mission, no concrete efforts to support training and modernization at Fort Leonard Wood, and no legislation to expand healthcare or transition services for veterans in our district. Instead, he treats these committee assignments like titles for his résumé, not tools to serve Missouri.
My Priorities: Real Support for Military Families and Veterans
When I’m elected as your congressman, I will use every lever of federal support to strengthen Missouri’s military communities. That means:
Protecting Base Missions: Working closely with Department of Defense leaders to ensure Whiteman and Fort Leonard Wood keep critical missions and funding, preventing any base realignment or cuts that could harm our communities.
Veteran Healthcare and Services: Expanding access to VA clinics, urgent care partnerships, and mental health programs so our veterans don’t wait months for care or drive hours to get the help they need.
Military Family Support: Securing housing, childcare, and spousal employment programs to reduce the strain on families stationed in Missouri.
Infrastructure for Base Communities: Pushing for federal grants that improve roads, schools, and broadband in base towns so local communities benefit alongside the installations.
Missouri Deserves More Than Empty Titles
Service members and veterans don’t need photo-ops—they need action. They need someone in Washington who will fight to make sure their missions are secure, their families are supported, and their service is honored. While my opponent enjoys the prestige of committee assignments without delivering results, I will prioritize Missouri’s military bases and veteran communities every single day.
When I’m elected, I’ll stand with our bases, our service members, and every veteran who calls Missouri home. Because supporting our military isn’t just good politics—it’s the right thing to do.
By Ricky Dana, Candidate for U.S. House – Missouri’s 4th District
ENGLISH — ICE and Due Process: What the Record Shows
Courts and major news outlets have documented serious due-process failures in U.S. immigration enforcement—alongside patterns of stops and arrests linked to race, accent, and language. These failures have swept up legal immigrants and, at times, even U.S. citizens. The facts demand reform that respects the Constitution and basic fairness.
Key facts: A federal court recently limited immigration raids in Southern California, barring stops based on apparent race/ethnicity or on someone speaking Spanish or accented English. Judges have also ordered ICE to improve conditions and protect confidential legal access in New York City’s holding facility. Detention has surged to record highs—approaching 59,000–60,000 people—with a large share having no criminal record. Courts have ruled for wrongfully detained U.S. citizens, including Peter Sean Brown in Florida; investigations have documented citizens held for days, months, and even years.
Bottom line: Enforcement without due process undermines public trust and violates core American values. We can secure the border, follow the law, and protect civil rights at the same time—by ending profiling, guaranteeing access to counsel, and requiring individualized suspicion for detentions.
ESPAÑOL — ICE y el debido proceso: lo que muestran los hechos
Fallos judiciales y reportajes han demostrado problemas graves de debido proceso en la aplicación de las leyes migratorias de EE. UU., junto con patrones de detenciones ligados al color de piel, al acento y al idioma. Estos problemas han afectado a inmigrantes con estatus legal e incluso, en ocasiones, a ciudadanos estadounidenses.
Datos clave: Un tribunal federal limitó redadas en el sur de California y prohibió paradas basadas en la raza aparente o en que una persona hable español o inglés con acento. Jueces ordenaron a ICE mejorar condiciones y proteger la comunicación confidencial con abogados en un centro de detención de Nueva York. La detención alcanzó niveles récord (cerca de 59,000–60,000 personas), muchas sin antecedentes penales. Tribunales fallaron a favor de ciudadanos detenidos por error, como Peter Sean Brown en Florida.
Conclusión: Hacer cumplir la ley sin respetar el debido proceso viola valores fundamentales. Debemos terminar el perfilamiento, garantizar acceso a abogados y exigir sospecha individualizada para las detenciones.
FRANÇAIS — ICE et le droit au procès équitable : ce que montrent les preuves
Des décisions de justice et des enquêtes médiatiques révèlent de graves atteintes au droit au procès équitable dans l’application des lois migratoires des États-Unis, ainsi que des contrôles fondés sur la couleur de peau, l’accent ou la langue. Des résidents réguliers—et même des citoyens américains—en ont été victimes.
À retenir : Un tribunal fédéral a restreint des opérations en Californie du Sud, interdisant des contrôles fondés sur l’origine apparente ou le fait de parler espagnol ou un anglais avec accent. Des juges ont aussi ordonné à l’ICE d’améliorer les conditions et l’accès confidentiel aux avocats à New York. La détention atteint un niveau record (≈59 000–60 000), beaucoup sans casier criminel. Les tribunaux ont donné raison à des citoyens détenus à tort, comme Peter Sean Brown en Floride.
Conclusion : Sécurité et droits constitutionnels doivent aller de pair : pas de profilage, accès à un conseil, suspicion individualisée.
العربية — آيس والإجراءات القانونية الواجبة: ما تُظهره الوقائع
تكشف أحكام المحاكم وتقارير إعلامية عن انتهاكات خطيرة للإجراءات القانونية الواجبة في إنفاذ قوانين الهجرة بالولايات المتحدة، إضافة إلى أنماط من الإيقاف والاعتقال المرتبطة بالعرق أو اللكنة أو اللغة. وقد شملت هذه الانتهاكات مهاجرين قانونيين وأحيانًا مواطنين أمريكيين.
حقائق أساسية: حدّت محكمة فيدرالية من المداهمات بجنوب كاليفورنيا، ومنعت الإيقاف بناءً على العِرق الظاهر أو التحدث بالإسبانية أو الإنجليزية بلكنة. وأمرت محاكم بتحسين الظروف وضمان التواصل السري مع المحامين في منشأة نيويورك. بلغ الاحتجاز مستوى قياسياً يقارب 59–60 ألف شخص، وكثيرون بلا سجل جنائي. كما أنصف القضاء مواطنين احتُجزوا بالخطأ، منهم بيتر شون براون في فلوريدا.
الخلاصة: يجب إنهاء التنميط وضمان الوصول إلى المحامين واشتراط الاشتباه الفردي قبل الاحتجاز.
SOMALI — ICE iyo Hab-raaca Caddaaladda
Go’aammo maxkamadeed iyo warbixinno madax-bannaan ayaa muujiyay dhibaatooyin culus oo ku saabsan due process (hab-raaca caddaaladda) ee fulinta qaanuunka socdaalka ee Maraykanka, iyo qaabyo joojin/qabasho oo ku xiran midabka, lahjadda, ama luqadda. Tani waxay saameysay muhaajiriin sharciyeysan iyo mararka qaarkood xataa muwaadiniin Maraykan ah.
Waxyaabaha muhiimka ah: Maxkamad federaal ah ayaa xaddidday howl-galada Koonfurta California, kana mamnuucday joojinta qof ku saleysan muuqaalka jinsiyadeed ama ku hadalka Isbaanish ama Ingiriisi lahjad leh. Garsoorayaal ayaa sidoo kale amray hagaajinta xaaladaha iyo helitaanka sirta ah ee qareennada xarun ku taal New York. Tirada dadka la hayo ayaa gaartay heer taariikhi ah (qiyaastii 59,000–60,000), kuwa badanna dambiyo ma leh. Maxkamado ayaa garab istaagay muwaadiniin si khalad ah loo hayay, sida Peter Sean Brown ee Florida.
Gunaanad: Ilaalinta xuduudaha iyo ilaalinta xuquuqda dastuuriga ahi waa inay isla socdaan—jooji qaybinta jinsiyadeed, xaqiiji helitaanka qareen, oo u baahow tuhun gaar ah ka hor xabsi.
by Ricky Dana, Candidate for U.S. House – Missouri’s 4th District
Mark “Awful for Missouri” Alford Turns Oversight into a Vacation
When a member of Congress travels overseas on official business, it is not just another trip. It is a chance to show respect to our allies, evaluate America’s readiness, and, most importantly, to honor the service of the men and women who wear our nation’s uniform. But Mark “Awful” Alford has once again shown he does not take his responsibility seriously. He showed up to a U.S. military base visit overseas wearing shorts. Yes—shorts. On an official congressional delegation.
This is not about fashion. It is about respect. It is about representing Missouri and the United States with dignity. When Alford dresses like he is at a backyard cookout instead of an official military briefing, he sends a clear message: he sees his taxpayer-funded trip as a personal vacation, not a solemn duty. That matters, because perception is reality in politics. To the service members standing in full dress uniforms and to the international leaders watching, his choice looked unserious, careless, and disrespectful.
Taxpayer Dollars, Tourist Behavior
Missourians should not have to pay for a congressman to play tourist in Europe. Trips like these are funded by hardworking families—farmers trying to stretch every dollar to cover the cost of feed and fertilizer, veterans navigating a strained VA system, parents working two jobs to keep food on the table. They expect their representatives to treat every dollar as sacred, not as a ticket to a sightseeing junket.
Overseas congressional trips are supposed to be oversight missions. Members of Congress are tasked with inspecting military facilities, understanding regional security threats, and ensuring America’s investments abroad are being spent wisely. These trips are not perks. They are responsibilities. When Alford shows up unprepared and underdressed, it tells Missourians he is not focused on oversight. He is focused on himself.
In a time when so many families in Missouri’s 4th District are fighting to get by, this kind of behavior is salt in the wound. It sends the message that while regular folks struggle, their representative is on a taxpayer-funded European holiday. Missouri families deserve more than a congressman who treats official duties like vacation days.
Respect for Service Members
The men and women stationed overseas sacrifice daily for our nation. They live far from home, work long hours, and serve in conditions that most Americans cannot imagine. When members of Congress visit them, it should be a moment of solidarity and respect. Every detail matters. A representative should carry himself with dignity, because he is not just representing himself—he is representing Missouri, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the entire country.
By showing up in shorts, Alford sent the opposite message. It trivialized the seriousness of the visit. Service members notice these things. They notice when their elected officials stand with them, and they notice when their officials treat their sacrifices as little more than a backdrop for photo opportunities. Missouri deserves a representative who shows gratitude and honor—not one who makes a joke of the occasion.
Missouri Deserves Better
What does this all boil down to? Respect. Respect for the office. Respect for the taxpayers footing the bill. Respect for the service members who deserve to be taken seriously. Mark “Awful” Alford has shown once again that he is more interested in playing celebrity and sightseeing on the taxpayers’ dime than in fulfilling the responsibilities of his office.
Missourians deserve a representative who understands that every trip is about service, not self-interest. Every briefing matters. Every interaction with service members carries weight. Every taxpayer dollar should be treated with care, not wasted on a congressman’s European photo-op in shorts.
When I’m elected as your congressman, I will carry Missouri’s voice with seriousness and respect. I will honor our service members, treat taxpayer funds as sacred, and ensure every action I take reflects the dignity of the office. Shorts on a military base? That will never happen under my watch. Because representing Missouri is not about sightseeing—it is about serving.
I’m cutting through the headlines on the big issues that matter to Missouri’s 4th District: federal spending, the border, the farm bill, VA care, Social Security, and rural broadband. Here’s what’s real, what’s spin, and what it means for us.
What’s Moving—and What’s Just Noise
Federal Spending — Half-Built, Deadline Looming. The Senate passed a “minibus” that covers Agriculture and Military Construction–VA. The House still has work to do before the September 30 deadline. That’s not “mission accomplished.” We need a full budget on time—no shutdown brinkmanship.
Border Policy — Courts Are in the Mix. The White House paused refugee admissions starting January 27. It also issued new entry restrictions from certain countries. Separate legal fights are underway over attempts to limit asylum and over a birthright citizenship order. Bottom line: the border is not “closed,” and asylum isn’t “over.” Policies are being tested in court and some are on hold.
Farm Bill — One Foot In, One Foot Out. Congress extended the 2018 Farm Bill through September 30, 2025. That means the core safety net continues for now. There are proposals to update price-risk tools and dairy mechanics, but the full “Farm Bill 2.0” is still ahead. Farmers need a real, steady bill—no games.
VA Care — Easier Access; Tech Still Slow. The VA made Community Care simpler by extending many authorizations to a full year for standard services. That’s a practical win for our veterans and local providers. The electronic health record rollout remains slow and will take years, but the access change helps right now.
Social Security — Math First, Slogans Last. Trustees say the main retirement trust fund runs short in 2033 (combined OASDI in 2034) unless Congress acts. That would mean about 77–81% of scheduled benefits. No, Social Security taxes on benefits weren’t “repealed.” Some tax relief exists elsewhere, but the core issue is solvency. We need a bipartisan fix that protects current retirees and keeps promises to younger workers.
Broadband — Real Help for Rural Roads. Missouri’s BEAD Round 2 application window is open now. This is a chance to pull fiber down the gravel roads and long lanes that have been ignored for years. I’m pushing for fair maps, solid bids, and accountability so our dollars actually reach the unserved parts of MO-4.
Why This Matters to MO-4
Folks here don’t ask for much—straight talk, fair budgets, safe streets, and a government that works. We feed the country and show up for our neighbors. We deserve a Congress that meets deadlines, keeps the border orderly and lawful, delivers a real farm bill, honors veterans with faster care, and fixes Social Security without games. That’s the standard I’m holding them to, and it’s the standard I’ll bring to Washington when I’m elected as your congressman.
Bottom Line
No theater. No chest-thumping. Just do the work. I’ll keep tracking these bills and court rulings so you have the facts—not the spin.
By Ricky Dana, Candidate for U.S. House – Missouri’s 4th District
Quick Take:
Yes, I use AI — but not how the trolls think. I write every word myself. AI just checks my spelling, grammar, and facts, and helps shorten long posts so everyone can follow along. It’s a tool, not my ghostwriter.
Some people will twist anything to stir the pot. Recently, someone accused me of using AI to write my campaign posts. That’s false. I’ve been a professional writer for decades — speeches, grants, national newsletter articles, ghostwritten scripts — all before AI even existed. Writing is my craft. I don’t need AI to do it for me.
Here’s the truth: I use AI to summarize my own work for people who prefer short posts over full-length articles. I use it to check grammar, punctuation, and facts so I don’t put out misinformation. I use it to simplify complex language so more people can understand my ideas. I also use AI for some graphics — alongside Photoshop, Adobe Express, GIMP, and the work of a professional graphic artist.
That’s it.
When people feel threatened by intelligence, they often assume success must be “cheating.” I’ve learned that constructive criticism is valuable, but baseless accusations are just noise. And let’s be honest — trolls like this are often clout-chasers or political plants hoping to distract from the real issues.
Yes, AI has an environmental impact — but so do Meta, Google, Amazon, Microsoft, and every other major data center you interact with daily. Singling out AI while ignoring those facts is selective outrage. For example, U.S. data centers—which power AI among other technologies—already consume over 4% of the nation’s electricity, with projections showing that could climb to 12% by 2028 [oai_citation:0‡New York Post](https://nypost.com/2024/12/25/opinion/no-more-debate-ais-energy-needs-put-every-fuel-in-play/?utm_source=chatgpt.com).
As your next congressman, I’ll never let personal bias override logic. I’ll work across party lines to craft legislation that serves everyone — not just the loudest voices or the wealthiest donors. When Congress works together, America wins. When we stay locked in partisan gridlock, Americans lose.
America is a constitutional democratic republic, but it’s sliding toward oligarchy. That happens when billionaires dictate policy and voters keep sending party-line drones to Washington. We can change that — with transparency, pragmatism, and bipartisan cooperation.
I’m not here to play the left vs. right blame game. I’m here to get results. And no troll on Facebook is going to change that.
By Ricky Dana, Candidate for U.S. House – Missouri’s 4th District
This is a clear and unequivocal warning: I will not tolerate slander, libel, or any other defamatory statements—whether made openly or under the guise of anonymity. Defamation is unlawful. If it continues, I will act immediately to protect my name and campaign.
Understand this: anonymous posting is not a shield. Websites and platforms typically log the Internet Protocol (IP) address used to publish content. With a valid court order or subpoena, those logs can be obtained from the platform and, where appropriate, subscriber information can be obtained from the internet service provider. Courts around the country use recognized legal standards to decide when an anonymous poster may be “unmasked,” including the Dendrite and Doe v. Cahill tests, which require evidence that a legitimate defamation claim exists before disclosure is ordered.
First Amendment rights are fundamental, but they do not protect false statements of fact that harm another person’s reputation. If you publish defamatory claims about me or my campaign—anonymously or otherwise—you can be identified and held accountable in court.
Let this serve as a blanket cease‑and‑desist: stop all defamatory statements now. If the conduct continues, I will immediately file suit, seek monetary damages, costs, and any other relief allowed by law. Where conduct crosses into unlawful threats, stalking, or harassment, I will also file reports with the proper authorities. Under Missouri law, defamation claims are civil actions and must be brought within the statute of limitations.
Choose your words carefully. The next ones could be read aloud in a courtroom.
Let’s be honest—right now, Democrats aren’t winning many popularity contests, especially here in rural America. And there’s a reason for that. Too many in my party have moved too far from the center, focusing on issues that don’t reflect the day-to-day concerns of folks who work the land, raise their families, and keep small towns running. They’ve forgotten what it’s like to live where neighbors know your name, where common sense still matters, and where people expect their leaders to listen instead of lecture.
But this isn’t just a Democratic problem. Republicans have done the same thing—diving deeper into division, choosing political fights over practical solutions. Both major parties have gotten caught up in the noise instead of doing the job they were sent to do: serving the American people.
I’m a Democrat, but I’m also a proud Missourian with rural roots. I understand the values of hard work, responsibility, fairness, and community. That’s why I call myself a common-sense Democrat—because I believe in standing for what’s right, even if it means disagreeing with my own party. I don’t believe in pushing an agenda that ignores the needs of rural families, farmers, and small business owners.
America has been great before, and it can be great again. We’re in a slump—not because the American people have failed, but because too many in Washington have stopped working together. The solution isn’t more division—it’s more cooperation. It’s finding the middle ground where we can pass legislation that benefits everyone, not just one side’s base.
When I’m elected as your congressman, I will work with both Democrats and Republicans to create bipartisan legislation that strengthens our economy, supports rural communities, and protects the freedoms we all value. That means prioritizing agriculture, infrastructure, job creation, healthcare access, and veterans’ services—issues that matter here at home.
Our nation’s greatness doesn’t come from political victories. It comes from the hard work and determination of the American people. It comes from building bridges instead of walls between neighbors. It comes from leaders who are willing to listen, compromise, and put country over party.
I’m running for Congress because I believe Missouri’s 4th District deserves a representative who reflects our values, understands our way of life, and refuses to play the partisan games that have held our country back. It’s time to move forward together, with respect, common sense, and a commitment to making the United States stronger than ever.
The future is ours to shape—if we choose leaders who are willing to work together, find solutions, and put the American people first. That’s the kind of leadership I’ll bring to Washington.
By Ricky Dana, Candidate for U.S. House of Representatives – Missouri’s 4th District
We both want a stronger Missouri—but the path we take matters. My path is built on homegrown values, rural priorities, and common-sense solutions that come from living and working right here in our community. My opponent’s record, on the other hand, reflects an allegiance to out-of-state donors and Washington insiders.
Homegrown Leadership, Not Outsider Influence
I was born and raised in rural Missouri. I know the struggles our families face because I’ve lived them. My campaign isn’t funded by billionaire donors or PACs from thousands of miles away—it’s powered by Missourians who want real change.
Mark Alford’s campaign, however, leans heavily on out-of-state special interests. That kind of money doesn’t come without strings—and it rarely aligns with the priorities of rural Missouri.
Putting Rural Missouri First
My platform focuses on the things that matter most to our communities:
Affordable housing through the Build Missouri First initiative—using federal surplus land and local builders without adding to the national debt.
Rural healthcare access so every family can get the care they need close to home.
Infrastructure improvements that keep our small towns connected and thriving.
These aren’t just talking points—they’re actionable plans ready for day one.
Contrast in Records
While I focus on targeted investments in our communities, my opponent’s voting record tells a different story. For example, on July 18, 2025, Mark Alford voted for the Rescissions Act, which cut $7.9 billion in foreign aid and $1.1 billion from public broadcasting. That includes PBS and NPR—resources that bring news, education, and culture to rural areas where other options are scarce.
That vote may have pleased party leaders and big donors, but it doesn’t serve rural Missouri families.
Why This Matters
When your representative answers first to outside money, your voice gets lost. I answer to you—the people of Missouri’s 4th District. My commitment is to build a future where our kids have opportunities here at home, not just in the big cities or out-of-state.
Be Part of the Change
This campaign is about more than winning an election—it’s about returning power to the people of Missouri. Every dollar donated helps spread our message, reach more voters, and fight back against the influence of big money in politics.
Too often, young voters feel invisible in the political process. You’re told to “wait your turn,” or worse, ignored altogether. But the truth is, your turn is right now. Your energy, your creativity, and your ideas are exactly what this country needs to move forward.
As Shirley Chisholm, the first African American woman elected to the U.S. Congress, once said: “If they don’t give you a seat at the table, bring a folding chair.” This isn’t just a quote—it’s a roadmap for action. Don’t wait for permission to have a voice. Demand it.
I’m not here to just talk about representing you—I’m here to actually do it. My email is always open to my constituents, no matter your age. If you’ve got an idea, a concern, or a vision for Missouri’s 4th District, I will listen and take it seriously. You can reach me at danar [at] rickydana [dot] org any time.
I share your frustration with career politicians who seem more concerned with keeping their jobs than serving the people. I’m also realistic about something that medical science makes clear: cognitive decline can become more likely after age 70. While dementia isn’t a normal part of aging, subtle declines in processing speed, attention, and memory can occur. These changes matter when we’re talking about making critical, fast-moving decisions for the nation’s future.
This isn’t about ageism—it’s about pragmatism. Leadership in Congress should be sharp, focused, and in touch with the people it serves. That means having a mix of experience and fresh perspective, and it means electing people who are willing to adapt and listen—not just talk.
If you’re a young voter, I want you to know this: your voice is worth more than the votes you cast. It’s worth shaping policy, holding leaders accountable, and building the future you want to see. And when I’m elected as your congressman, you won’t have to fight for a seat at the table—I’ll be saving you one.
In 2025, it’s unacceptable that Pulaski County still has homes, farms, and businesses struggling with slow, unreliable, or completely absent internet service. In today’s economy, broadband is not a luxury—it’s basic infrastructure, as critical as electricity or clean water. Yet for many in our county, the “digital divide” is still very real, limiting educational opportunities, job growth, telehealth access, and even farm operations that rely on precision agriculture technology.
To fix this, we need to focus on two connected solutions: building a middle-mile backbone and creating a locally controlled broadband co-op. Middle-mile infrastructure refers to the high-capacity fiber lines that connect regional internet hubs to local distribution networks. Without this backbone, last-mile providers can’t deliver affordable, high-speed service to homes and businesses. Unfortunately, private internet companies often avoid building middle-mile in rural areas because the return on investment is too slow. That’s where federal and state grants come in.
The National Telecommunications and Information Administration’s (NTIA) Enabling Middle Mile Broadband Infrastructure Program is designed to fill this gap. This program, along with the USDA’s ReConnect Program, can fund the construction of this essential backbone. Missouri has already won funding under NTIA’s Broadband Infrastructure Program that includes Pulaski County—but that’s only the start. The key is to strategically extend these lines to reach underserved areas, not just the easiest or cheapest routes.
Once the backbone is in place, a member-owned broadband co-op can take over last-mile deployment. This is a proven model: electric co-ops brought power to rural America in the 1930s when private utilities refused to invest, and today, many of those same co-ops are doing it again with broadband. A local broadband co-op ensures decisions are made by and for Pulaski County residents, not out-of-state shareholders. It also means profits are reinvested into the community rather than siphoned away.
Middle-mile plus a local co-op is a sustainable, long-term solution—but we also need immediate steps. That means challenging inaccurate FCC broadband maps that leave our communities ineligible for funding. It means streamlining pole attachment agreements so co-ops and small ISPs can connect new lines faster. It means working with schools, libraries, and local governments to create “community anchor networks” that serve as both service hubs and emergency internet points during disasters.
As your congressman, I’ll work to:
Secure middle-mile funding for Pulaski County through NTIA and USDA programs.
Partner with local leaders to launch a member-owned broadband co-op.
File formal challenges to flawed FCC broadband maps that undercount underserved households.
Advocate for fair pole-attachment rules that cut deployment costs for co-ops and small providers.
Support workforce training so local residents can take the good-paying jobs created by broadband expansion.
Broadband is more than streaming movies—it’s the bridge to economic opportunity, quality healthcare, and modern education. In rural Missouri, it can mean whether a farm stays competitive, a business can expand, or a student can finish a degree. Pulaski County cannot wait for the big providers to decide it’s profitable enough. We must build it ourselves, with public investment and local control.
When I’m your congressman, I’ll make rural broadband a priority—not just in Pulaski County, but across Missouri’s 4th District. That means real infrastructure, local ownership, and a commitment to ensuring no home, farm, or business is left offline.
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
